Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6311•Filiberto Feliciano v. CAPTAIN J. COX, Albemarle District Jail
18-6311Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6311
FILIBERTO FELICIANO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN J. COX, Albemarle District Jail; OFFICER BROOKS, Albemarle
District Jail; P.A. PETER WOGLOM, Albemarle District Jail,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03254-FL)
Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Filiberto Feliciano, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE BOND
DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Jay C. Salsman, HARRIS,
CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Filiberto Feliciano appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Feliciano v.
Cox, No. 5:15-ct-03254-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 20 & entered Mar. 21, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.