Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6427•Tamara Stanfield v. RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden
18-6427Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.07.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6427
TAMARA STANFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden; BRADLEY BUTLER, Security Chief; DAYENA
CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; STEVEN BEEMAN, Sergeant;
JEFFREY SHIMKO, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (8:16-cv-04149-GLR)
Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tamara Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tamara Stanfield appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Stanfield v. Graham, No. 8:16-cv-04149-GLR (D. Md. filed Mar. 27, 2018 & entered
Mar. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.