Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6484•United States of America v. Samuel Paul Crook
18-6484Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.08.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6484
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 18-6485
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1;
3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1)
Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to
grant a new trial and/or dismiss all federal charges. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1, 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-
DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2018). We deny Crook’s motion for appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.