Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6666•Anthony Quentin Kelly v. Correctional Officer Mathew G. Baker
18-6666Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.11.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6666
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MATHEW G. BAKER; SERGEANT
WILLIAM L. THOMAS; WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; STATE OF
MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01433-RDB)
Submitted: October 25, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Kelly v. Baker, No. 1:17-cv-01433-RDB (D. Md. May 15
& 29, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.