Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-6955•Jr-Godfrey B. Walker v. Beth Arthur; J. Barrett
18-6955Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.11.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6955
JR-GODFREY B. WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BETH ARTHUR; J. BARRETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD)
Submitted: November 20, 2018 Decided: November 26, 2018
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
JR-Godfrey B. Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
JR-Godfrey B. Walker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walker v.
Arthur, No. 1:18-cv-00716-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. July 3, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.