Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-7255•Malcolm Muhammad v. Y. Taylor; C. S. Arms; J. Sykes; J. D. Hurt; Henry Ponton
18-7255Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15.08.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7255
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
Y. TAYLOR; C. S. ARMS; J. SYKES; J. D. HURT; HENRY PONTON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ROD WICKER; R. CLARY; R. MATHENA; T. LOWE; J. KISER; CAPTAIN LEE;
M. KEGLEY; G. K. WASHINGTON; ERMA LOCUST,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Pamela Meade Sargent, Magistrate Judge. (7:16-cv-00500-PMS)
Submitted: July 29, 2019 Decided: August 15, 2019
Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the magistrate judge’s final order and judgment after
a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims.∗ We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the order and
judgment. See Muhammad v. Taylor, No. 7:16-cv-00500-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 2018).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.