Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-7416•Oscar Omar Lobo-Lopez v. J. ROY ORMOND, Warden
18-7416Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.04.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7416
OSCAR OMAR LOBO-LOPEZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J. ROY ORMOND, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-01073-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: March 26, 2019 Decided: April 16, 2019
Before DIAZ, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Omar Lobo-Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Omar Lobo-Lopez, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)
motion and denying it for lack of authorization. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lobo-Lopez v. Ormond, No. 1:18-cv-01073-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.