Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1105•Don W. McKinney v. Commonwealth of Virginia; Circuit Court of Wise County; United States District Court
19-1105Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.05.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1105
DON W. MCKINNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; CIRCUIT COURT OF WISE COUNTY;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big
Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00051-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 28, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Don W. McKinney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Don W. McKinney appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and imposing a
prefiling injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McKinney’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, McKinney has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s orders. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 175 (4th Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.