Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1121•Phillip O’briant v. Sherri Renner; Steve Midge
19-1121Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit13.03.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1121
PHILLIP O’BRIANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHERRI RENNER; STEVE MIDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01324-GLR)
Submitted: March 6, 2019 Decided: March 13, 2019
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip O’Briant, Appellant Pro Se. Suzzanne W. Decker, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE,
PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip O’Briant seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the motion to
dismiss his claims against one of the Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order that O’Briant seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the
motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.