Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1340•Holly Jean Nolan v. ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary for Department of Veteran Affairs
19-1340Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.08.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1340
HOLLY JEAN NOLAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary for Department of Veteran Affairs; CHRIS
SUNUNU, Governor of New Hampshire; PETER HUTCHINS, PLLC, Attorney;
PHIL SCOTT, Governor of Vermont; BERNIE SANDERS, US Senator; JEANNE
SHAHEEN, US Senator; PATRICK LEAHY, US Senator; COMMITTEE ON
TEMPORARY SHELTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00063-MR-WCM)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Holly Jean Nolan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Holly Jean Nolan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because it is possible that Nolan could cure the
defects in her complaint through amendment, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va.
Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with
instructions to allow Nolan to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.