Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-2090•Richard E. Boggs v. UNITED STATES; PETER RAE, and coworkers, et al. as individuals; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
19-2090Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.03.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2090
RICHARD E. BOGGS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES; PETER RAE, and coworkers, et al. as individuals; INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:18-cv-03506-MGL)
Submitted: February 7, 2020 Decided: March 4, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard E. Boggs, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Curtis Clarence Pett, Tax Division,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard E. Boggs appeals the district court’s orders adopting the report and
recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and
denying Boggs’ motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Boggs v. United States, No. 3:18-cv-03506-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 8 & Sept. 4, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.