Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-6268•John Keith Smith v. Doctor Inder Jeet Singh Gujral
19-6268Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.08.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6268
JOHN KEITH SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WANDA ROLLINS; C. WEBB,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00293-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: July 19, 2019 Decided: August 5, 2019
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Keith Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ramon Rodriguez, III, SANDS ANDERSON, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Keith Smith appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Doctor Inder Gujral in Smith’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. Gujral, No. 3:16-cv-00293-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.