Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-6423•Priest Momolu V.s. Sirleaf, Jr. v. Andrew McCabe; Rod Rosenstein; Adam Schiff; U.s.
19-6423Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.08.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6423
PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW MCCABE; ROD ROSENSTEIN; ADAM SCHIFF; U.S.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00240-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: August 12, 2019 Decided: August 21, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights
action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Sirleaf v. McCabe, No. 7:19-cv-00240-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 18,
2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.