Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-7065•United States of America v. Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
19-7065Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.11.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)
Submitted: November 9, 2021 Decided: November 12, 2021
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Aigbekaen, No. 1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2 (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2020). We deny as moot
the Government’s motion to dissolve abeyance, and we deny Aigbekaen’s motions for
mandamus, for fees, to intervene in a prison matter, for acquittal, to reverse the district
court’s detention order, to expedite and for immediate release, to dismiss his sex trafficking
conviction, for resentencing, and to supplement. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.