Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-7260•Nicodemus Wright v. High Tonya; Willis J. Fowler; Cindy Denis; Danielle Edwards; Steven Press
19-7260Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.08.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7260
NICODEMUS WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HIGH TONYA; WILLIS J. FOWLER; CINDY DENIS; DANIELLE EDWARDS;
STEVEN PRESS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03112-D)
Submitted: August 20, 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicodemus Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Corrine Lenore Lusic, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicodemus Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and deny Wright’s motion to vacate
the judgment. Wright v. Tonya, No. 5:17-ct-03112-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.