Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-7632•Edward L. Wiggins v. Correctional Officer Johnson
19-7632Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.04.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7632
EDWARD L. WIGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00840-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 21, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward L. Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward L. Wiggins appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion to reconsider the court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018)
complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s
conclusion that Wiggins’ Rule 60(b) motion was untimely filed. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s denial of Rule 60(b) relief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.