Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-7675•Brandon J. Thompson v. Frederick Entzel
19-7675Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.04.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7675
BRANDON J. THOMPSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FREDERICK ENTZEL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:19-cv-00011-FPS-JPM)
Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020
Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon J. Thompson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation, granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss or for
summary judgment, and dismissing Thompson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Entzel, No. 5:19-cv-00011-FPS-JPM
(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.