Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-1132•Therresseia Boland v. United States of America
20-1132Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.10.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1132
THERRESSEIA BOLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00113-MSD-LRL)
Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 26, 2020
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert J. Haddad, Andrew M. Hendrick, RULOFF, SWAIN, HADDAD, MORECOCK,
TALBERT & WOODWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. G. Zachary
Terwilliger, United States Attorney, Lauren A. Wetzler, Chief, Civil Division, Alexandria,
Virginia, Virginia Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Therresseia Boland appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of the United States in Boland’s action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”),
28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-80. We agree with the district court that the statute of limitations
barred Boland’s claims under the FTCA, see 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), and that she failed to
establish grounds for equitable tolling, see Raplee v. United States, 842 F.3d 328, 333 (4th
Cir. 2016). Accordingly, we affirm. Boland v. United States, No. 2:18-cv-00113-MSD-
LRL (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.