Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-1153•Joshua Fuller-Deets v. National Institutes of Health
20-1153Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.03.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1153
JOSHUA FULLER-DEETS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:18-cv-03175-GJH)
Submitted: February 5, 2021 Decided: March 24, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Fuller-Deets, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Fuller-Deets appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) on Fuller-Deets’ complaint challenging NIH’s
prohibition against bringing a service dog-in-training to his job on the NIH campus. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Fuller-Deets v. National Institutes of Health,
No. 8:18-cv-03175-GJH (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.