Fenyang Stewart v. WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., Hon.

20-1514Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.01.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1514
FENYANG STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., Hon., in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department
of Commerce; ANDREI IANCU, in his official capacity as Director, United States
Patent & Trademark Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01369-LMB-TCB; 1:16-cv-
00213-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: January 4, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fenyang Ajamu Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine M. Yang, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Fenyang Stewart appeals the district court’s order (a) dismissing in part, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the amended consolidated complaint in Stewart’s consolidated
employment actions, which related to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office terminating
Stewart’s employment in 2016; and (b) granting Defendants partial summary judgment on
one of the claims asserted in the amended consolidated complaint. Upon review of the
parties’ arguments in conjunction with the record on appeal and the relevant authorities,
we discern no reversible error in the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned analysis.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Ross,
Nos. 1:18-cv-01369-LMB-TCB; 1:16-cv-00213-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2020). We
deny Stewart’s motion for leave to supplement his informal brief and for the appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.