Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-1706•Marcialena Tremble Brown v. Centerra-Savannah River Site; Jerry Stevenson; Raymond Smith
20-1706Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.02.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1706
MARCIALENA TREMBLE BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CENTERRA-SAVANNAH RIVER SITE; JERRY STEVENSON; RAYMOND
SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02047-SAL)
Submitted: January 26, 2021 Decided: February 2, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcialena Tremble Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Wofford Johnson,
GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marcialena Tremble Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Brown v. Centerra-Savannah River Site, No. 1:19-cv-02047-SAL
(D.S.C. May 29, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.