Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
2018r2-u-pdf•8:98-cr-00520-PJM-2) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dustin John Higgs
2018r2-u-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.01.2021
FILED: January 8, 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 20-18
(8:98-cr-00520-PJM-2)
___________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
DUSTIN JOHN HIGGS
Defendant - Appellee
___________________
O R D E R
___________________
Upon consideration of submissions relative to the government’s motion to dispense
with, or alternatively expedite, oral argument, the court denies the motion in light of the
novel legal issues presented.
Entered at the direction of Judge Keenan with the concurrence of Judge Floyd.
Judge Richardson dissented from the order and filed a dissenting opinion.
For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
-- 1 of 2 --
2
RICHARDSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
I continue to respectfully dissent from our decision to delay this case by scheduling
oral argument two weeks after the scheduled execution. See Order, ECF 15, No. 20-18
(Jan. 7, 2020) (Richardson, J., dissenting). That decision frustrates the Executive’s
prerogative and ignores the Supreme Court’s guidance, both of which provide good reason
to decide with dispatch.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.