Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-2051•United States of America v. Daniel O’brien
20-2051Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.03.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL O’BRIEN,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
ELIZABETH O’BRIEN; CITIZENS AND FARMERS BANK,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00396-HEH)
Submitted: March 4, 2021 Decided: March 10, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Earl Christensen, Matthew Steven Johnshoy,
Curtis Clarence Pett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Daniel O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his
settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
O’Brien, No. 3:18-cv-00396-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 7 & Sept. 4, 2020). We deny O’Brien’s
motions for clarification, production of documents, and to strike claims. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.