Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-6232•Joel Garcia-Calderon v. F.c.i. Edgefield Warden; Recreation Yard Officers and Staff
20-6232Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.09.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6232
JOEL GARCIA-CALDERON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
F.C.I. EDGEFIELD WARDEN; RECREATION YARD OFFICERS AND STAFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (9:18-cv-02947-TMC)
Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel Garcia-Calderon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joel Garcia-Calderon appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Garcia-Calderon’s complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden, No. 9:18-cv-02947-TMC (D.S.C.
Jan. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.