Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-6486•Clayton T. Jones v. Officer Chris E. Odom
20-6486Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.07.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6486
CLAYTON T. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER CHRIS E. ODOM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (3:19-cv-03326-TMC)
Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clayton T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clayton T. Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2018). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones
v. Odom, No. 3:19-cv-03326-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.