Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-6563•Harvey R. Johnson v. Warden Hudgins
20-6563Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.02.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6563
HARVEY R. JOHNSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN HUDGINS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00226-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 26, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harvey R. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting
Respondent’s dispositive motion and dismissing without prejudice Johnson’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition. Johnson also appeals the district court’s subsequent order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Hudgins, No. 5:19-cv-
00226-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & Apr. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.