Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-6758•Gregory Simmons-Bey, a/k/a Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey v. NANCY MCFARLAND, City of Raleigh
20-6758Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.11.2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6758
GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Alton Gregory Simmons-Bey,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NANCY MCFARLAND, City of Raleigh; CHRISTOPHER A. MACKAY; RISK
MANAGEMENT DIVISION; DOROTHY K. LEAPLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03297-D)
Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 20, 2020
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Simmons-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Simmons-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Simmons-Bey v. McFarland, No. 5:19-ct-03297-D (E.D. Va. May 15, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.