Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-6960•Metkel Alana v. OFFICER ROSE, Corrections Officer
20-6960Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.03.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6960
METKEL ALANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER ROSE, Corrections Officer; TERESA MEADE, Corrections Officer; J.
TURNER, Corrections Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS)
Submitted: February 22, 2021 Decided: March 22, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Metkel Alana, a Virginia prisoner who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the
Director of the Department of Corrections (“the Director”) and three corrections officers,
appeals the district court’s orders granting the Director’s motion to dismiss and granting
the officers’ summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Alana v. Rose, No. 7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019; June 8, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.