Leroy Anthony Griffin v. Curtis Brown; Nardia Pressley; Mykira Presley; Sarah Thacker

20-7178Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.10.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7178
LEROY ANTHONY GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CURTIS BROWN; NARDIA PRESSLEY; MYKIRA PRESLEY; SARAH
THACKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:19-cv-00106-HMH)
Submitted: August 26, 2021 Decided: October 1, 2021
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leroy Anthony Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES,
ELLIOTT, TYLER & SALEEBY, PA, Florence, South Carolina; Mark Victor Gende,
William Alexander Neinast, SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Leroy Anthony Griffin appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffin v. Brown, No. 4:19-cv-00106-
HMH (D.S.C. July 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.