Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-7387•United States of America v. Ryan Lamar Holland
20-7387Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.05.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7387
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RYAN LAMAR HOLLAND,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00445-TDS-1)
Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EJ Hurst II, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Matthew G. T. Martin, United States
Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Lamar Holland appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Holland, No. 1:10-cr-00445-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.