Gregory Richardson v. Director, Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation

20-7552Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.06.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7552
GREGORY RICHARDSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL REHABILITATION,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:20-cv-00018-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: June 1, 2021 Decided: June 4, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Richardson appeals the order of the United States District Court for the
Western District of Virginia transferring his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Richardson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253,
256 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.