Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-7711•James Jamison v. B. Harlow, Rn
20-7711Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.05.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7711
JAMES JAMISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. HARLOW, RN; JON BREMAR, Empt.; MICHAEL WEAVER, HSA; R.
GROVE, HSA; EDDIE ANDERSON, Dr.; JOSHUA HALL, RN/Iop/Idc,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00080-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: April 7, 2022 Decided: May 19, 2022
Before DIAZ, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Jamison, Appellant Pro Se. Maximillian Fitzsimmons Nogay, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Jamison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. See Jamison v. Harlow, No. 5:20-cv-00080-JPB-JPM
(N.D.W. Va. Nov. 6, 2020); see also Hixson v. Moran, 1 F.4th 297, 302-03 (4th Cir. 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.