Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-7744•Destined C. M. D. George v. Dr. P. Moore; R. Hubbard
20-7744Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.05.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7744
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. P. MOORE; R. HUBBARD,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHAPLAIN CAUTHORNE; GRACE ON THE INSIDE; DR. FOX; D. BALL;
ARMOUR MEDICAL SERVICES,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00631-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: May 25, 2021 Decided: May 27, 2021
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Destined C. M. D. George, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley,
TIMBERLAKE SMITH, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
.
Destined C. M. D. George appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having reviewed the record and finding no reversible error, we
affirm the decision of the district court. George v. Moore, No. 7:19-cv-00631-JPJ-PMS
(W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2020). We deny George’s motion to appoint counsel, and we deny as
unnecessary George’s motion to retain the record in the district court. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.