In re: Antonio Marco Herrera

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1050
In re: ANTONIO MARCO HERRERA,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-01301-LO-JFA)
Submitted: March 18, 2021 Decided: March 23, 2021
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Marco Herrera, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Marco Herrera, a Virginia inmate, petitions for a writ of mandamus. By
way of his mandamus petition, Herrera challenges this court’s December 21, 2020 decision
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. See In re Herrera, 831 F. App’x 639,
640 (4th Cir. 2020). Because the writ of mandamus may not “be used as a substitute for
the regular appeals process,” and because Herrera can ask the Supreme Court to review our
December 21, 2020 decision, we deny the petition. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542
U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --