Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-1347•Aaron Lee Hairston v. SALLY JACKSON, Family Court Judge
21-1347Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.09.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1347
AARON LEE HAIRSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SALLY JACKSON, Family Court Judge; THE FAMILY COURT OF
BERKELEY COUNTY, MARTINSBURG; WEST VIRGINIA BUREAU FOR
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; JENNIFER C. SHOMO; EDYTHE NASH
GAISER, State Supreme Court Clerk; THE STATE SUPREME COURT FOR ITS
ACQUIESCE TO THE CLERKS UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00174-GMG)
Submitted: August 26, 2021 Decided: September 9, 2021
Before WILKINSON, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Lee Hairston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Lee Hairston appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hairston’s complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hairston v. Jackson, No. 3:20-cv-00174-GMG (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 22, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.