Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-1433•Bruce W. Pearson v. Prince William County School Board
21-1433Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.09.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1433
BRUCE W. PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01543-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 17, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce W. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Faith Abar Alejandro, SANDS ANDERSON, PC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce W. Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of the Prince William County School Board on Pearson’s race discrimination and
retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pearson v. Prince
William Cnty. Sch. Bd., No. 1:19-cv-01543-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.