Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-1720•Dax Johnson v. Michael Santomassimo, a man acting as CFO for Wells Fargo Bank; WELLS FARGO BANK
21-1720Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.11.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1720
DAX JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL SANTOMASSIMO, a man acting as CFO for Wells Fargo Bank;
WELLS FARGO BANK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00766-RDB)
Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 19, 2021
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dax Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Zev Herbst, REED SMITH LLP, Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dax Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss
his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), (6). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v.
Santomassimo, No. 1:21-cv-00766-RDB (D. Md. May 27, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.