Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-2289•Derrick Allen, Sr. v. Magistrate Judge L. Patrick Auld; District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder
21-2289Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2289
DERRICK ALLEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD; DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-00776-MOC-JEP)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Allen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Allen’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
Allen’s complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Auld, No. 1:21-cv-00776-
MOC-JEP (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.