Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-2301•Latoya Phillips v. Wakemed
21-2301Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.05.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2301
LATOYA PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAKEMED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00626-M)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Latoya Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. David Ransom Ortiz, Kerry Shad, SMITH,
ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Latoya Phillips appeals the district court’s order granting WakeMed’s Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phillips
v. WakeMed, No. 5:20-cv-00626-M (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.