United States of America v. Cheyenne Fragale

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHEYENNE FRAGALE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:17-cr-00112-1)
Submitted: August 9, 2021 Decided: October 6, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheyenne Fragale, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cheyenne Fragale appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act
of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Fragale’s
motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating
standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Fragale, No. 5:17-cr-00112-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 23, 2020). We deny Fragale’s motion
to amend or correct the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --