Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-6069•Christopher Gann v. Warden J. Andrews
21-6069Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.07.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6069
CHRISTOPHER GANN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN J. ANDREWS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00204-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Gann, Appellant Pro Se. Meghan Elizabeth Loftus, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Gann, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting
Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Gann’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gann v. Andrews, No. 1:20-cv-00204-TSE-TCB (E.D.
Va. Nov. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.