Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-6177•Raoul Lafond v. Richard S. Glaser, Jr.; Walter C. Holton, Jr.; Clifton Thomas Barrett; Lynne P. Klauer
21-6177Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.06.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6177
RAOUL LAFOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD S. GLASER, JR.; WALTER C. HOLTON, JR.; CLIFTON THOMAS
BARRETT; LYNNE P. KLAUER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00557-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raoul Lafond, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Raoul Lafond appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) Lafond’s complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lafond v. Glaser, No. 1:20-cv-00557-
CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.