Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-6482•James D. Pridgen v. J. ANDREWS, Warden
21-6482Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.06.2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6482
JAMES D. PRIDGEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J. ANDREWS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-hc-02300-BO)
Submitted: May 28, 2021 Decided: June 24, 2021
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Pridgen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James D. Pridgen, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his sentence. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Pridgen v. Andrews, No. 5:15-hc-02300-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.