Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-6810•Deandre Johnson v. SALLY YECKLEY; KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent
21-6810Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.08.2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6810
DEANDRE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SALLY YECKLEY; KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00770-HEH-EWH)
Submitted: July 13, 2023 Decided: August 7, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deandre Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG &
FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deandre Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action under §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1).∗ We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Johnson v. Yeckley,
No. 3:20-cv-00770-HEH-EWH (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ Although the district court dismissed Johnson’s amended complaint in part without
prejudice, we conclude that we have jurisdiction over the appeal. See Britt v. DeJoy,
45 F.4th 790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.