Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-6895•United States of America v. Davieyon Develle Hopkins
21-6895Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.05.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6895
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVIEYON DEVELLE HOPKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00002-FDW-1)
Submitted: March 14, 2022 Decided: May 17, 2022
Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Davieyon Develle Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Davieyon Develle Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B), and § 404(b) of the First Step Act
of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. The district court determined that
Hopkins was eligible for relief under the First Step Act but declined to exercise its
discretion to reduce Hopkins’ sentence after assessing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.
After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion
in denying Hopkins’ motion. See United States v. Jackson, 952 F.3d 492, 497, 502 (4th
Cir. 2020). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.