Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7063•United States of America v. James Hair, a/k/a Mook
21-7063Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.05.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7063
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES HAIR, a/k/a Mook,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cr-00204-JKB-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Hair, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Hair appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate
release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record on appeal
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hair’s motion.
See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Hair, No. 1:18-cr-00204-JKB-1 (D. Md. June 9, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.