Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7249•Destined C. M. D. George v. C.o. Puckett, sued in individual
21-7249Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7249
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
C.O. PUCKETT, sued in individual and official capacity; C.O. OH, sued in
individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00846-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Destined C. M. D. George, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Destined C. M. D. George appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on George’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. George v. Puckett, No. 7:19-cv-00846-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. July 22, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.