Robert Wilkins v. DAVID SHAW, Administrator

21-7272Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.02.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7272
ROBERT WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID SHAW, Administrator; JAMES MCVIGOR, Sheriff; PHIL CORBETT,
Chief; ELAINE TANSKI, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES MARSHALS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03031-D)
Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON
(US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Robert Wilkins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of four individually named defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Shaw, No. 5:20-ct-03031-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20,
2021). We grant Wilkins’ motion to amend in part, insofar as he seeks to supplement the
arguments in his informal brief, but deny the motion to amend in part, insofar as Wilkins
seeks substantive relief from the district court’s order. We deny Wilkins’ request for
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.