Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7332•United States of America v. Michael Daniel Hammonds
21-7332Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.03.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL DANIEL HAMMONDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 21-7333
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL DANIEL HAMMONDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00118-NCT-1; 1:02-
cr-00119-NCT-1)
Submitted: March 24, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Daniel Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael Daniel Hammonds challenges the district
court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release.
We review a district court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of
discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.