Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-7568•Demetric Hardaway v. Lori Myers
21-7568Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11.06.2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7568
DEMETRIC HARDAWAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORI MYERS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FRANCES JOHNSON; NICOLE CHAPMAN; EDSEL TAYLOR,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:20-cv-00149-RMG)
Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: June 13, 2022
Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Hardaway, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, HOOD LAW FIRM,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Hardaway appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment in favor of Lori Myers in Hardaway’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s amended judgment. Hardaway v. Myers, No.
8:20-cv-00149-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.